Understanding Cost-In-Use versus Cost per Pound

May 2019

A key factor that contributes to the cost of natural colours in a final product formulation is the usage rate. Thus, the most effective approach to cost analysis of two or more solutions would be cost-in-use comparisons, versus cost/lb. The potential variation in pigment concentration amongst botanicals used for colour solutions greatly impacts cost-in-use.

cost-in-use-test-tubes

For example, a product developer might be trialing black carrot colour solutions from two different suppliers whose black carrot sources vary in pigment concentration. The solution from the more concentrated botanical typically equates to a lower usage level and might have a much lower impact on total formulation cost.

While the cost per pound could seem high, you really need to calculate the cost-in-use to know which colour is most efficient.

Concentration is not specific to the colour industry, there are many other fields that focus on higher strength products, including:

cost-in-use-detergent

The message of concentrated products is generally similar, “a little goes a long way,” and this result is exactly what Sensient’s agronomy team is working on with our botanicals for colour—natural colour, more for less.

Watch this video to learn more:

Sensient is making great strides in developing botanical sources with higher pigment levels. Our efforts will continue to improve over time.

Interested in trialing our new portfolio of highly concentrated natural food colours?

CHECK OUT OUR BROAD PORTFOLIO OF NATURAL COLOURS

Related Posts